The Micah Parsons trade saga may be over, but the fallout isn’t. All offseason, Jerry Jones questioned the wisdom of signing Parsons, in part, citing a punitive cap number and concerns about availability. Parsons was traded on August 28.
Within days, the Dallas Cowboys inked DaRon Bland to a 4-year, $92 million deal with $50 million guaranteed. Bland missed ten games in 2024 with a foot injury, and now, after only one game, will be sidelined for multiple weeks with another foot issue.
Parsons? He’s missed four games due to injury in his entire career. Jerry’s logic doesn’t add up.
Micah Parsons Trade Fallout: DaRon Bland Got Paid, And He’s Already Hurt
DaRon Bland Is A Good Player—Parsons Is Elite
There’s no question DaRon Bland is a good football player. He’s got a nose for the ball, he’s versatile, and any team would be happy to have him. But for the love of God, he’s not Micah Parsons. Jerry Jones justified trading Parsons by questioning his dependability, then turned around and gave $92 million to a corner who’s already missed more games in one season than Parsons has in his entire career.
That’s like trading in a car because you say it’s unreliable, then buying one that isn’t as good and actually breaks down more often.
Jerry “saved” money by giving Bland $50 million guaranteed instead of the record-setting dollars that Parsons would have commanded. Here’s the problem: Bland isn’t nearly as good as Parsons, nor will he ever be as impactful. Parsons is a pass rusher—the most premium position outside of quarterback. Bland is playing slot corner. You tell me which one tilts the game.
The idea, of course, is that the money saved by moving on from Parsons can be spread across multiple players. Many are better than one, right? Wrong.
Who’s making personnel decisions? Jerry. Jerry hasn’t made a needle-moving free agent signing in years. The Cowboys draft good players, wait until the last minute to pay them, and then shell out at the top of the market. If that’s the strategy, you might as well pay the best player at his position.
Tyler Smith—eligible for an extension and an absolute stud— is developing into a perennial All-Pro. But he’s a guard, one of the least premium positions in the NFL. Having a dominant interior line is really great, but it’s not the same thing as having a game-altering pass rusher. Betting that “many” will somehow equal the impact of Parsons isn’t a strategy. It’s wishful thinking.
Short-Term Savings, Long-Term Loss
Parsons was a win-now and a win-in-the-future player. He’s the kind of superstar you keep and build your defense around. Trading him might create more financial flexibility and bring a couple of future picks, but it also stripped Dallas of its biggest difference-maker—the only defensive player who forced opposing teams to change their game plans. That’s not a retooling move. It’s a rebuilding one.
Jerry framed the Parsons trade as a way to invest in “many over one.” But that’s not how NFL roster building works. Not all pieces are created equal. You don’t trade away your best player for the hope that a couple of late first-round draft picks and some cap space will eventually add up to equal value. By the time those players develop—if they do at all—the Cowboys’ opportunity to contend will have slammed shut. If it hasn’t already.
This roster is built to win right now. Dak Prescott is absolutely capable of being a Super Bowl-winning quarterback. There are difference-makers at receiver. And the offensive line is stocked with young talent. That’s the core of a contender. By trading Parsons, Jerry effectively chose a win-later strategy in the middle of a potential win-now opportunity.
In the NFL, contention windows don’t stay open very long.
Micah Parsons Trade Fallout: Flawed Logic, Lasting Consequences
If Jerry Jones can talk himself into trading Micah Parsons because of “availability” and a cap number, then no player should feel safe. Draftees, free agents, even the guys in the locker room now—why would they believe Dallas will actually reward greatness? The Cowboys didn’t just lose an elite player. They exposed a front office willing to justify anything, even bad logic, to avoid paying the best player on the field.
Parsons was the kind of player you simply don’t trade— certainly not at this point in his career—because he redefined your defense the second he stepped on the field. You don’t replace that with “depth” or hope that a couple of picks pan out. Moves like this don’t just set the team back a season; they alter the trajectory of a franchise. The fallout of the Micah Parsons trade proves it—and for a team that hasn’t been to an NFC Championship Game in almost three decades, that’s malpractice.
Main Photo: [Kevin Jairaj] – Imagn Images
The post Jerry Jones Traded Micah Parsons To Pay Other Guys. One Is Already Hurt appeared first on Last Word on Pro Football.